Obama's Infomercial - Same Tired Promises and Spin
Did you hear any reference to how "patriotic" "spreading the wealth around" would be? Did you hear any references to meeting with our enemies heads-of-state with out preconditions? Did you hear how excited he is to sign the "FOCA" "first thing" after becoming POTUS? Did you hear any thing about "renegotiating NAFTA?" Did you notice that the threshold for those who are going to get a "tax cut" has fallen another $50,000 from a family making $250,000 to a family making $200,000? Did he mention that the threshold is not indexed for regional cost of living? Did he mention that a family making $200,000 in Boston or LA where the cost of living is VERY HIGH, would be taxed just like the family making $200,000 living in Boise or Omaha?
Nope.
Obama stuck to his carefully crafted speech that his handlers told him was what American's wanted to hear, and even in that he had to spin and spin and spin to make any sense of his proposals.
The following is an AP story on presentation last night. I could not have done a better job, so I won't bother and include for your consideration the entire article:
Just reading through those sound-bites from last night's televised hootenanny should cause you some concern, never mind the spin. $15 billion for alternative energy? by Obama's own accounting, earmarks of $18 billion are inconsequential and small fraction of the government budget, so how are we going to make real progress toward energy independence with $15 billion?. Save us $2500 a year on health care? When, a decade from now?WASHINGTON -- Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was less than upfront in his half-hour commercial Wednesday night about the costs of his programs and the crushing budget pressures he would face in office.
Obama's assertion that "I've offered spending cuts above and beyond" the expense of his promises is accepted only by his partisans. His vow to save money by "eliminating programs that don't work" masks his failure throughout the campaign to specify what those programs are -- beyond the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
A sampling of what voters heard in the ad, and what he didn't tell them:
THE SPIN: "That's why my health care plan includes improving information technology, requires coverage for preventive care and pre-existing conditions and lowers health care costs for the typical family by $2,500 a year."
THE FACTS: His plan does not lower premiums by $2,500, or any set amount. Obama hopes that by spending $50 billion over five years on electronic medical records and by improving access to promen disease management programs, among other steps, consumers will end up saving money. He uses an optimistic analysis to suggest cost reductions in national health care spending could amount to the equivalent of $2,500 for a family of four. Many economists are skeptical those savings can be achieved, but even if they are, it's not a certainty that every dollar would be passed on to consumers in the form of lower premiums.
THE SPIN: "I also believe every American has a right to affordable health care."
THE FACTS: That belief should not be confused with a guarantee of health coverage for all. He makes no such promise. Obama hinted as much in the ad when he said about the problem of the uninsured: "I want to start doing something about it." He would mandate coverage for children but not adults. His program is aimed at making insurance more affordable by offering the choice of government-subsidized coverage similar to that in a plan for federal employees and other steps, including requiring larger employers to share costs of insuring workers.
THE SPIN: "I've offered spending cuts above and beyond their cost."
THE FACTS: Independent analysts say both Obama and Republican John McCain would deepen the deficit. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates Obama's policy proposals would add a net $428 billion to the deficit over four years -- and that analysis accepts the savings he claims from spending cuts. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, whose other findings have been quoted approvingly by the Obama campaign, says: "Both John McCain and Barack Obama have proposed tax plans that would substantially increase the national debt over the next 10 years." The analysis goes on to say: "Neither candidate's plan would significantly increase economic growth unless offset by spending cuts or tax increases that the campaigns have not specified."
THE SPIN: "Here's what I'll do. Cut taxes for every working family making less than $200,000 a year. Give businesses a tax credit for every new employee that they hire right here in the U.S. over the next two years and eliminate tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas. Help homeowners who are making a good faith effort to pay their mortgages, by freezing foreclosures for 90 days. And just like after 9-11, we'll provide low-cost loans to help small businesses pay their workers and keep their doors open. "
THE FACTS: His proposals -- the tax cuts, the low-cost loans, the $15 billion a year he promises for alternative energy, and more -- cost money, and the country could be facing a record $1 trillion deficit next year. Indeed, Obama recently acknowledged -- although not in his commercial -- that: "The next president will have to scale back his agenda and some of his proposals."
Obama is not a change agent, just another pitiful carny huckster trying to pitch his cure all snake-oil. The only difference is he won't just skip town after duping us, and we won't just be out a few hard earned dollars when it all said and done.

Hey Tony,
Thanks for the link!
Jon
Reply to this
Hey, the people have a right to know what a Change Agent is... Jon Dale is one... Barack Obama is not....
Reply to this