Obama's Long March - Revolution in the Air
So, Obama is continuing his long march toward American Socialism, which has an uncanny resemblance to European Socialism, which has in fact been a resounding failure. For those ignorant few who insist that the Nationalization of the Banking, Mortgage, Insurance, Health Care and Auto Industries is not Socialism, I present for you the dictionary definition of Socialism:
Now for many, Socialism is not a pejorative term, but a objective goal. For clarity's sake, I will plainly state that when I say Socialist, I am using it in a pejorative sense, as the identifying label for the enemy of all things American. Unlike the rally cry of the Communist, "Property is theft!" my rally cry is "Socialism is Theft!". Socialism is the apex of unfairness, the bane of innovation and the hammer that pounds the anvil of Oligarchy.

WE THE PEOPLE loan the Federal Government power. They do not grant us rights, those are self-evident and an endowment from our creator. WE THE PEOPLE can stop Obama's Long March toward globalist socialism. He (They) can not take from us what we do not willingly hand over.
Revolution is in the air. WE THE PEOPLE will determine if this is a revolution that takes power from the people or from our employee, the Government. We can let a group of people treat our employee/government as if they are a hired Mercenary charged with raiding and looting their neighbor, or we can charge our employee/government to hold the highest values of Stewardship.
The Revolution is unstoppable. The outcome, determined by our collective adherence to the values and principals defined in WE THE PEOPLE'S Constitution hangs in the balance.
so·cial·ism (sō'shə-lĭz'əm) n.
Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.
Now for many, Socialism is not a pejorative term, but a objective goal. For clarity's sake, I will plainly state that when I say Socialist, I am using it in a pejorative sense, as the identifying label for the enemy of all things American. Unlike the rally cry of the Communist, "Property is theft!" my rally cry is "Socialism is Theft!". Socialism is the apex of unfairness, the bane of innovation and the hammer that pounds the anvil of Oligarchy.
ol⋅i⋅gar⋅chy [ol-i-gahr-kee] –noun, plural -chies.WE THE PEOPLE are giving, giving because our freedom can not be taken without our consent, a small group (545) of arrogant, privileged, above the law, tax-evading, bureaucrats the power to determine how the output of our labor, the product of our innovation and the achievements of our effort are to be divided among the masses.
1. a form of government in which all power is vested in a few persons or in a dominant class or clique; government by the few.
2. a state or organization so ruled.
3. the persons or class so ruling.

WE THE PEOPLE loan the Federal Government power. They do not grant us rights, those are self-evident and an endowment from our creator. WE THE PEOPLE can stop Obama's Long March toward globalist socialism. He (They) can not take from us what we do not willingly hand over.
Revolution is in the air. WE THE PEOPLE will determine if this is a revolution that takes power from the people or from our employee, the Government. We can let a group of people treat our employee/government as if they are a hired Mercenary charged with raiding and looting their neighbor, or we can charge our employee/government to hold the highest values of Stewardship.
The Revolution is unstoppable. The outcome, determined by our collective adherence to the values and principals defined in WE THE PEOPLE'S Constitution hangs in the balance.

1 question:
How else would you figure we solve problem?
Reply to this
The question proposed was "How would I solve the problem"?
I would start by having the States re-affirm their sovereignty under the 10th Amendment to the Constitution and reclaim the responsibility for their own issues.
I would eliminate all income taxes and move to a revenue system based upon consumption, not based upon production.
I would eliminate all federally run social welfare programs and federal mandates not specifically outlined in the Constitution and hence reserved for administration by the states.
I would revoke the suffrage rights of all Citizens that are not stakeholders in the system.
I would institute mandatory term limits and return to a citizen governance model as envisioned by the founding fathers, eliminating professional politicians and the resulting bureaucrats.
I would repeal all forms of prohibition.
I would return to a hard currency standard.
I would acknowledge that we have no intention of repaying the national debt, which is un-payable and prepare the world economy to abandon all forms of fiat currency.
I would end Social Security as it stands today and return the responsibility for retirement to the people.
I would demand that citizens take responsibility for their own actions and for their own pursuit of happiness.
That is a good place to start....
Reply to this
Limit the budget of the federal government.
Dismantle all departments not specifically prescribed by the constitution.
Dismantle the standing armies. Each state would have a militia that would be subject to call up "upon good and just declaration of war"
No more wars of aggression for the sake of money.
Outlaw lobbying.
Dismantle the central bank.
Make states responsible for their senators and representatives upkeep....it is none of my concern how much money the constituents of another state pay their senator.
Dismantle the court opinion system and do away with all law that was established by opinion....courts may judge "constitutional" or "not constitutional" no more legislation from legal forums.
This list could go on for quite a while....
Reply to this
Wow... Tony, the deepness of your understanding both humbles my shallow existence and awareness, as well as it serves to stimulate my mind.
Here are a couple of thoughts, though... Suppose (this being a HUGE stretch given the status of our state population) Colorado attempted to reclaim it's sovereignty as per the 10th Amendment... Undoubtedly the outcome, even if it went as far as the Supreme Court, would be unanimous on the side of the Federal Government. The scenario I see would be Federal intervention in our state, to the point of Federal troops being sent it to restore Federal power, we would physically be forced into a "Revolution" as you so eloquently stated if we refused as a state to acquiesce... Which I feel the Founders would say at this point is long overdue.
Coupling my confusion, is the verse about, "Slaves obey their Masters," and how Jesus didn't ever seem to advocate that a physical and violent rebellion would be an option for those that chose to follow Him... The Early Church always submitted to Rome, and consequently they were looked upon as model citizens, and eventually persecuted just the same, even to the point of martyrdom. This has long since caused me confusion over our own Revolution from England. We, as Americans were rebels at heart from the beginning, and somehow Abba has seen fit to bless us as Americans in spite of this fact. Now mixed in this in regards to my thoughts- is the overwhelming influence of the freemasons on our Founding Fathers, and how, even as wise, intelligent, and as noble as they might have been- were probably under great deceit from the enemy during the time they formed this society...
Just some thoughts, unraveling the quagmire in my brain upon reading your article... I don’t presume to debate you on any stance that your solutions could and would begin to restore our society if there was a possibility of carrying them out, I just wonder if we as Americans could be accepting of such drastic truths and solutions to our current situation.
Reply to this
The sovereignty is not succession, just a reclamation of the rights we did not give to the Federal Government.
The Federal Government works for the states according to our Constitution, not the other way around. We have allowed for a massive federal power grab over the last 100 years that has undermined our freedom and our dignity.
The Early Church went into hiding in many cases and did not walk voluntarily into the Lion's Den (or gladiatorial games).
Freemasonry did have some impact on our Founders, but not in the Universalist Unitarian way that is manifest in the current rendition of Masonic ideology.
I believe our Founders were guided by the Lord to create this great republic and that as Joesph said to his brothers, "What you intended for evil the Lord purposed for good..."
Read how Jesus will come back. Not as a suffering servant but as a conquering warrior.
Reply to this
If it be the end times then it is pre-ordained....and we must comply...but we don't and won't know that it is the end until it is revealed to us.....
Jesus may have been a pacifist and while the word of G-d is a mighty sword, it is even mightier backed up by a dose of lead traveling at a couple thousand feet per second.
"But now whoever has a wallet must take it along, and his traveling bag, too. And the one who has no sword must sell his coat and buy one." Luke 22:36
I do not think the translations do this verse justice, Jesus' rebuke to peter was justified as Jesus had told his followers what would and must be, but when we look back over time.....how many enemies of the lord our g-d be brought down by force? And will the lord not return as a conqueror...and that will not be the last time....as time and events are cyclical.
The reason we tolerate transgressions....even the fore fathers knew and stated as such in the declaration.
"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
I myself am not so sure that free masonry was a bad thing, but I do know that Banks are a bad thing and that all things can and will be manipulated by the dark one to meet his ends, the symbols used on our currency are there for propaganda purposes if no other.....
So if it is not the end times, what then? Do we lay down and prostrate ourselves before our own servants? No....we go on and we renew ourselves....
John Stewart Mill wrote
“ But war, in a good cause, is not the greatest evil which a nation can suffer. War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing is worth a war, is worse. When a people are used as mere human instruments for firing cannon or thrusting bayonets, in the service and for the selfish purposes of a master, such war degrades a people. A war to protect other human beings against tyrannical injustice – a war to give victory to their own ideas of right and good, and which is their own war, carried on for an honest purpose by their free choice – is often the means of their regeneration. A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. As long as justice and injustice have not terminated their ever-renewing fight for ascendancy in the affairs of mankind, human beings must be willing, when need is, to do battle for the one against the other.
There will always be the wolves among to meet out injustice....let the sheepdogs bring justice.
Sa vis pacem, PARABELLUM! (If you desire peace, prepare for war!
Reply to this